Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Rev Med Virol ; 31(6): e2215, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1573992

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus disease-2019 (Covid-19) public health emergency has caused enormous loss around the world. This pandemic is a concrete example of the existing gap between availability of advanced diagnostics and current need for cost-effective methodology. The advent of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay provided an innovative tool for establishing a rapid diagnostic technique based on the molecular amplification of pathogen RNA or DNA. In this review, we explore the applications, diagnostic effectiveness of LAMP test for molecular diagnosis and surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Our results show that LAMP can be considered as an effective point-of-care test for the diagnosis of Covid-19 in endemic areas, especially for low- and middle-income countries.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Point-of-Care Testing/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Bibliometrics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/pathology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/economics , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/instrumentation , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/economics , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/instrumentation , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/economics , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/instrumentation , Point-of-Care Testing/economics , RNA, Viral/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn ; 21(8): 751-755, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1269466

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pharmacy-based point-of-care testing has long had the potential to improve patient access to timely care, but adoption has been slowed by financial and regulatory barriers. The COVID-19 pandemic reduced or temporarily eliminated many of the barriers to pharmacy-based testing. This review examines how the changes brought on by may impact pharmacy-based testing after the pandemic.Areas covered: This review searched peer-reviewed, lay, and regulatory literature to explore the implementation of pharmacy-based COVID-19 testing. This includes a review of regulatory and financial changes that removed barriers to testing. Additionally, it reviews the literature related to the growth of pharmacy-based testing.Expert opinion: It is clear that the COVID-19 pandemic created an awareness and opportunity for pharmacy-based point-of-care testing. The changes made in response to the pandemic have the potential to increase the role of pharmacy-based testing, but additional regulatory changes and wider pharmacy adoption are still needed to maximize the value of such services.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , Community Pharmacy Services , Point-of-Care Testing/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Community Pharmacy Services/economics , Community Pharmacy Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Point-of-Care Testing/economics , Point-of-Care Testing/legislation & jurisprudence , Reimbursement Mechanisms
6.
Echocardiography ; 38(3): 446-449, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1084702

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) led to a large influx of critically ill patients and altered echocardiography laboratory workflow. We developed a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) first approach to patients requiring echocardiography and describe our workflow and findings. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of all POCUS studies performed on critically ill patients with COVID-19. Sonography was performed by intensivists, uploaded and archived, and rapidly reviewed by echocardiographers. We evaluated each study based on the number of views obtained. Additionally, we provide a description of the workflow during the COVID-19 surge at a tertiary care hospital in New York City. RESULTS: Fifty patients had POCUS studies performed by intensivists and reviewed by echocardiographers obviating the need for sonographer-performed studies. Of the 48 cardiac POCUS studies, 17% of patients had 4 of 4 standard views available while 53% had 3 of 4 standard views. The parasternal long-axis view was obtained on 81%, subxiphoid view on 79%, apical 4-chamber view on 71%, and parasternal short-axis view on 63% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our POCUS workflow allowed intensivists to perform cardiac sonography for rapid bedside diagnosis of pathology with immediate interpretation performed by echocardiographers. At least 3 views were obtained in the majority of cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Illness , Echocardiography/methods , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Pandemics , Point-of-Care Testing/organization & administration , Comorbidity , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies
7.
ACS Nano ; 14(12): 16180-16193, 2020 12 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-974870

ABSTRACT

The management of the COVID-19 pandemic has relied on cautious contact tracing, quarantine, and sterilization protocols while we await a vaccine to be made widely available. Telemedicine or mobile health (mHealth) is well-positioned during this time to reduce potential disease spread and prevent overloading of the healthcare system through at-home COVID-19 screening, diagnosis, and monitoring. With the rise of mass-fabricated electronics for wearable and portable sensors, emerging telemedicine tools have been developed to address shortcomings in COVID-19 diagnostics, monitoring, and management. In this Perspective, we summarize current implementations of mHealth sensors for COVID-19, highlight recent technological advances, and provide an overview on how these tools may be utilized to better control the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Disease Management , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Telemedicine/methods , Antigens, Viral/analysis , Biosensing Techniques/instrumentation , COVID-19/pathology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Testing/instrumentation , Contact Tracing/instrumentation , Humans , Mobile Applications/supply & distribution , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Nanotechnology/instrumentation , Nanotechnology/methods , Physical Distancing , Point-of-Care Systems/organization & administration , Point-of-Care Testing/organization & administration , Quarantine/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Telemedicine/instrumentation
8.
J Appl Lab Med ; 6(2): 532-542, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-960522

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The need for rapid point-of-care (POC) diagnostics is now becoming more evident due to the increasing need for timely results and improvement in healthcare service. With the recent COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, POC has become critical in managing the spread of disease. Applicable diagnostics should be readily deployable, easy to use, portable, and accurate so that they fit mobile laboratories, pop-up treatment centers, field hospitals, secluded wards within hospitals, or remote regions, and can be operated by staff with minimal training. Complete blood count (CBC), however, has not been available at the POC in a simple-to-use device until recently. The HemoScreen, which was recently cleared by the FDA for POC use, is a miniature, easy-to-use instrument that uses disposable cartridges and may fill this gap. CONTENT: The HemoScreen's analysis method, in contrast to standard laboratory analyzers, is based on machine vision (image-based analysis) and artificial intelligence (AI). We discuss the different methods currently used and compare their results to the vision-based one. The HemoScreen is found to correlate well to laser and impedance-based methods while emphasis is given to mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin (MCH), and platelets (PLT) that demonstrate better correlation when the vision-based method is compared to itself due to the essential differences between the underlying technologies. SUMMARY: The HemoScreen analyzer demonstrates lab equivalent performance, tested at different clinical settings and sample characteristics, and might outperform standard techniques in the presence of certain interferences. This new approach to hematology testing has great potential to improve quality of care in a variety of settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/instrumentation , COVID-19/diagnosis , Hematologic Tests/instrumentation , Mobile Health Units/organization & administration , Point-of-Care Testing/organization & administration , Artificial Intelligence , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , Feasibility Studies , Hematologic Tests/trends , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Pandemics/prevention & control , Point-of-Care Testing/trends , Quality of Health Care
10.
Med Teach ; 42(11): 1310-1312, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-917565

ABSTRACT

Bedside skills have been declining over the last two decades, with multiple studies reporting increasing reliance on investigations and technology in making diagnostic decisions. During the Covid-19 crisis, even less time is spent at the bedside, and physical examinations seem markedly truncated or non-existent. It is possible that cost of health care, doctor-patient relationships, and the clinical reasoning skills could be seriously impacted by ongoing decrease in bedside skills and the teaching of these skills. Careful history taking and hypothesis-driven physical examination still form the backbone of clinical reasoning and lead to parsimonious investigations. Overreliance on investigations could drive up costs of healthcare if every diagnosis depends on a head to toe scan. In this paper, we describe strategies for bedside teaching that are relevant and applicable even during the pandemic and an era of physical distancing. These strategies are categorised as: before, during and after patient interactions at the bedside. These strategies can be adapted to normal clinical teaching situations as well as challenging situations such as the current pandemic when physical distancing is mandated.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Clinical Competence , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Physician-Patient Relations , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Point-of-Care Testing/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Humans , Inservice Training , Pandemics , Patients' Rooms/organization & administration , Physical Examination/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Biochem Med (Zagreb) ; 30(3): 030403, 2020 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-874945

ABSTRACT

To fight the virus SARS-CoV-2 spread to Europe from China and to give support to the collapsed public health system, the Spanish Health Authorities developed a field hospital located in the facilities of Madrid exhibition centre (IFEMA) to admit and treat patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infectious disease (COVID-19). The Department of Laboratory Medicine of La Paz University Hospital in Madrid (LMD-HULP) was designated to provide laboratory services. Due to the emergency, the IFEMA field hospital had to be prepared for patient admission in less than 1 week and the laboratory professionals had to collaborate in a multidisciplinary group to assure that resources were available to start on time. The LMD-HULP participated together with the managers in the design of the tests portfolio and the integration of the healthcare information systems (IS) (hospital IS, laboratory IS and POCT management system). Laboratorians developed a strategy to quickly train clinicians and nurses on test requests, sample collection procedures and management/handling of the POCT blood gas analyser both by written materials and training videos. The IFEMA´s preanalytical unit managed 3782 requests, and more than 11,000 samples from March 27th to April 30th. Furthermore, 1151 samples were measured by blood gas analysers. In conclusion, laboratory professionals must be resilient and have to respond timely in emergencies as this pandemic. The lab's personnel selection, design and monitoring indicators to maintain and further improve the quality and value of laboratory services is crucial to support medical decision making and provide better patient care.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Mobile Health Units/organization & administration , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , COVID-19 , Cities , Clinical Laboratory Information Systems/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospital Bed Capacity , Hospital Information Systems/organization & administration , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Humans , Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration , Personnel, Hospital/education , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Point-of-Care Testing/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain , Specimen Handling
12.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 78(4): 363-382, 2020 08 01.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-709296

ABSTRACT

The point-of-care tests (POCT) are subject to accreditation. A national inventory survey provides a synthesis of knowledge. The survey distributed 31 questions in 2019. 147 responses were received (75% biologists, 49% CHU, 42% CHG). Only 20.41% are accredited ISO22870, the majority for <50% of the medical departments; 70% say they are going there at the end of 2019 or in 2020. The maps are unknown for 32% (EBMD) and 82% (TROD). Visibility is poor with: medical establishment committee (40%), IT department (31%). Connection is necessary for 87-95% depending on the criterion (QC, authorizations, etc.) and 66% of answers highlight that less than 50% of connexion is effective. The major advantage is the delay of the result (62.5%), then the relationship with the health teams (33.3%). The disadvantages: difficulty of the quality approach (45%), cost of tests (34.3%). Human resource requirements are identified for technicians (82%) and biologists (76%). The multiplicity of sites, devices and operators means that it is difficult to set up and maintain. Biology outside the laboratories, under biological responsibility, must meet a rigorous imperative quality approach.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Global Health , Laboratories/statistics & numerical data , Laboratories/standards , Point-of-Care Testing , Accreditation , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Services/standards , Clinical Laboratory Services/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , France/epidemiology , Global Health/standards , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , History, 21st Century , Humans , Internationality , Laboratory Proficiency Testing/standards , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , Point-of-Care Systems/statistics & numerical data , Point-of-Care Testing/organization & administration , Point-of-Care Testing/standards , Point-of-Care Testing/statistics & numerical data , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 163(2): 265-270, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-378050

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To highlight emerging preoperative screening protocols and document workflow challenges and successes during the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large urban tertiary care medical center. Thirty-two patients undergoing operative procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic were placed into 2 preoperative screening protocols. Early in the pandemic a "high-risk case protocol" was utilized to maximize available resources. As information and technology evolved, a "universal point-of-care protocol" was implemented. RESULTS: Of 32 patients, 25 were screened prior to surgery. Three (12%) tested positive for COVID-19. In all 3 cases, the procedure was delayed, and patients were admitted for treatment or discharged under home quarantine. During this period, 86% of operative procedures were indicated for treatment of oncologic disease. There was no significant delay in arrival to the operating room for patients undergoing point-of-care screening immediately prior to their procedure (P = .92). DISCUSSION: Currently, few studies address preoperative screening for COVID-19. A substantial proportion of individuals in this cohort tested positive, and both protocols identified positive cases. The major strengths of the point-of-care protocol are ease of administration, avoiding subsequent exposures after testing, and relieving strain on "COVID-19 clinics" or other community testing facilities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Preoperative screening is a critical aspect of safe surgical practice in the midst of the widespread pandemic. Rapid implementation of universal point-of-care screening is possible without major workflow adjustments or operative delays.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Point-of-Care Testing , Preoperative Care , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Chicago , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Mass Screening , Otolaryngology/methods , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Point-of-Care Testing/organization & administration , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL